FOIA Request on UAP Keywords Produces Minimal Results, Heavy Redactions, from Energy Department

SOURCE: BlackVault — theblackvault.com (Tier 2)
CATEGORY: BUREAUCRACY
CREDIBILITY SCORE: 74/100  |  EVIDENCE SCORE: 30/100
LIKELY EXPLANATION: reputable lead — review and contextualize
TAGS: aaro, house oversight, congressional, foia, archive

Source Excerpt

Jennifer M. Granholm, Former Secretary, U.S. Department of Energy A newly released Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) response from the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) provides limited insight into internal communications involving unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), despite a broad request targeting multiple keywords tied to the subject. The request, submitted on May 23, 2024, sought all emails to, from, or copied to Secretary of Energy Jennifer Granholm containing terms such as “UAP,” “UFO,” “AARO,” and “Grusch,” among others. It also explicitly requested any associated attachments and directed the agency to search both classified and unclassified systems. According to the DOE’s final response, the search, which was conducted by the Office of the Secretary, identified just two responsive documents. Both were released in part, with significant portions withheld under multiple FOIA exemptions. During the course of processing, the scope of the request was amended to exclude news bulletins and later limited the search specifically to emails referencing “Luis” Elizondo vs. just “Elizondo”. This narrowing likely contributed to the relatively small number of responsive records, but omitted a lengthy review time of either already publicly available material, or responsive records that include name irrelevant to the topic requested. The two responsive documents consist of internal DOE emails dated May 22–23, 2024, sent by a staff member to Secretary Granholm in

Documents

Images

Editor Checklist (delete before publishing)

  • Verify the source URL still works and the content matches.
  • Rewrite the excerpt above in your own words. Do not publish raw scrape.
  • Add "Why It Matters" — concrete editorial framing.
  • Cross-reference with at least one independent source if possible.
  • Add Featured Image. Confirm category is correct (currently: BUREAUCRACY).
  • If credibility score is below 70, add explicit caveats to readers.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top