Inside the Pentagon’s Review of Christopher Mellon’s Alleged UFO Crash Retrieval Text

SOURCE: BlackVault — theblackvault.com (Tier 2)
CATEGORY: BUREAUCRACY
CREDIBILITY SCORE: 78/100  |  EVIDENCE SCORE: 30/100
LIKELY EXPLANATION: reputable lead — review and contextualize
TAGS: aaro, dod, pentagon, foia, archive

Source Excerpt

Christopher Mellon A newly released set of Defense Department documents reveals how the Pentagon handled former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence Christopher Mellon’s request to publish a message he said referenced an alleged effort to exploit “recovered off-world technology.” The records also reveal that Mellon’s first attempt to submit the material was returned to him after a DOPSR employee deemed his three-page mailed package a “security threat,” a detail he did not disclose in his public article. The documents, sent to The Black Vault under FOIA case 24-F-1134 , include Mellon’s original submission to the Defense Office of Prepublication and Security Review (DOPSR), internal emails, coordination records, and the March 1, 2024 approval that cleared him to release the message. The 17 pages released by the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) document DOPSR’s handling of Mellon’s submission from January through March 2024. The records show repeated delays, escalating internal pressure, and direct involvement from the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO), which was tasked with coordinating on the review. Mellon’s Submission: A Message Alleging Access to a Recovery Program The FOIA file begins with Mellon’s January 19, 2024, email to DOPSR, in which he submitted the text message screenshot he later published publicly. Mellon wrote that he was seeking confirmation “to confirm it is not classified,” and noted that a submission mailed earlier had

Documents

Images

Editor Checklist (delete before publishing)

  • Verify the source URL still works and the content matches.
  • Rewrite the excerpt above in your own words. Do not publish raw scrape.
  • Add "Why It Matters" — concrete editorial framing.
  • Cross-reference with at least one independent source if possible.
  • Add Featured Image. Confirm category is correct (currently: BUREAUCRACY).
  • If credibility score is below 70, add explicit caveats to readers.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top