NASA’s UAP report identified specific existing and future tools that could scientifically resolve whether UAP exhibit truly anomalous performance: (1) NISAR (NASA-ISRO Synthetic Aperture Radar): “The excellent resolution of NISAR will provide valuable radar data that will potentially be critical for examining UAP directly, in addition to their environmental context. SAR systems will also provide critical validation of any truly anomalous properties, such as rapid acceleration or high-G maneuvers through the Doppler signatures they produce.” This means NISAR could provide the definitive test: does a UAP actually accelerate at physically impossible rates, or is it a sensor artifact? (2) VERA C. RUBIN OBSERVATORY: The forthcoming large-sky ground survey telescope will “collect vast quantities of data, which can be directly used to search for anomalous objects beyond the Earth’s atmosphere.” (3) COMMERCIAL SATELLITE CONSTELLATIONS: “Commercial satellite constellations provide imagery at sub- to several-meter spatial resolution, which is well-matched to the typical spatial scales of known UAP.” Every point on Earth is not constantly covered, but when coincident collection occurs these constellations could directly resolve UAP. (4) AI/ML CRITICAL FINDING: “AI and ML have proven to be essential tools for identifying rare occurrences within vast datasets. At present, UAP analysis is more limited by the quality of data than by the availability of techniques.” The tools exist. The data collection standards do not. The report’s most significant technical finding: if anomalous accelerations are confirmed by multiple well-calibrated sensors, that constitutes “scientifically interesting” evidence pointing to “potentially novel explanations.”