The SCU Indications Analysis for Military and Public Activities (Hancock et al. 2025) applies US Army Unified Land Operations doctrine to UAP behavior and reaches a striking conclusion: “What is observed during the study period is OPPOSITE to the expected progression.” Standard contact protocol predicts: clandestine observation → overt recognition → contact → communication → collaboration. What was observed: 1945-1964 — high visibility daylight operations, interactive and radical flight, appearing to deliberately identify themselves as intelligent actors (“inferential messaging”). Late 1950s-1960s — electronic transmissions including CODED transmissions — possible limited communication attempts. 1970s onward — small groups of civilian observers at ground level, longer loitering periods, close approaches that observers frequently interpreted as aggressive or threatening — consistent with “Human Behavioral Studies” rather than contact. The progression then STALLED. UAPs became MORE clandestine after human military responses became aggressive. The perception of their activity became more negative over time. Nuclear weapons interference — the most consistent and alarming pattern — ran without interruption through the ENTIRE 30-year study period regardless of the shift in civilian encounter patterns. Conclusion: “A significant change in intentions related to the public domain may have occurred.”