CIA and DoD Retrieval Architecture: Decades of Covert UAP Recovery Operations Exposed
Liberation Times sources have disclosed the full covert UAP retrieval architecture: CIA Maritime Branch, US Navy, NURO, SOCOM, and Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution conduct recoveries. The DoD analyses structure, the DOE studies propulsion, and the CIA safeguards derived technology. The network includes US-Russian cooperation on undersea recoveries and dates operationally to World War Two.
The Retrieval Architecture
Liberation Times sources have disclosed the operational architecture of covert UAP retrieval missions spanning from World War Two to the present. The recovery chain involves multiple agencies with defined roles: the Maritime Branch of the CIA’s Directorate of Operations, the US Navy, the National Underwater Reconnaissance Office (jointly run by the Navy and CIA), and US Special Operations Command. For deep-sea recoveries, the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution has provided submergence vehicles.
Once recovered from undersea, craft are transferred to the Office of Naval Research, then handed to defence contractors for analysis. Division of labour: the DoD analyses craft structure and design; the Department of Energy specialises in studying propulsion systems; the CIA’s Directorate of Science and Technology safeguards adapted technology derived from the research.
In terms of materials recovered, I know of one occasion whereby a designated individual within the CIA’s Directorate of Operations collaborated with other agencies to decide which contractor to engage for analysis and exploitation. Such a decision depends on the circumstances. For instance, if the object is submerged and capable of undersea propulsion, it would be prudent to perhaps involve General Dynamics.
— IC source to Liberation Times
International Collaboration
The retrieval network is not purely American. Sources confirmed that after the Soviet collapse, the US and Russia cooperated on at least one undersea retrieval mission for a craft in Russian waters. US and allied governments have conducted collaborative recoveries — the Varginha, Brazil incident in 1996 reportedly involved both local authorities and identifiable US personnel securing materials on-site. Until recently, US and Chinese intelligence agencies were also exchanging UAP tracking data.
The 1933 Italian Craft — Vatican Connection
David Grusch has testified that documents he reviewed reported a spacecraft of alien origin recovered by Mussolini’s government in 1933 near Magenta, Italy — and procured by the United States in 1944 or 1945 with assistance from the Vatican and the Five Eyes alliance. Liberation Times sources have corroborated that retrieval missions stretching to World War Two were conducted by the CIA in collaboration with US defence. This places the programme’s operational history at over 80 years.
The Contractor Selection Process
The source’s description of contractor selection is significant for what it implies: the government has sufficient understanding of craft capabilities to select appropriate contractors based on those capabilities. Submarine propulsion capability points to General Dynamics. Space re-entry characteristics point to other contractors. This level of classification and technical discrimination is not consistent with a government that doesn’t know what it has.